However, in the case of recent regulatory findings, fines and intentions to fine issued by the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office (the “ICO”) against British Airways, Marriott and Dixons Carphone, all three companies have appealed or indicated an intention to appeal despite the significant difference in the levels of the fines/intentions to fine. In our view, this is related to the spectre of an emerging class action litigation culture in the UK that increases the stakes for any company facing negative regulatory findings.
在这个集中的博客中，我们探讨了这些决定背后的潜在动机，为什么我们希望在未来看到更多的公司，以及索法审议的决定采取的措施以及我们也考虑是否the companies that have failed to appeal and are now facing class actions made the right decision when they elected not to appeal.
Although many were hoping for substantial clarification on many of the Act’s provisions, the Amendment focuses primarily on cleaning up the text of the hastily-passed CCPA, and falls far short of addressing many of the more substantive questions raised by companies and industry advocates as to the Act’s applicability and implementation.阅读更多
上个月，联邦通信委员会（“FCC”）关闭了其拟议隐私法规的评论期，我们以前写的这里。这million dollar question on everyone’s minds is whether the final regulations will be broader or narrower in scope than the initial proposal, which included not only a significant expansion of the definition of personal information, but also sweeping new obligations and raised serious questions in areas where the obligations could become even stricter still.［1］因此，通过新规定的企业正在为广泛的数据收集和处理实践进行严格的FCC执法局审议。